Media Fail: Ted Cruz Crushes Another MSNBC ‘Walls Are Closing in’ Report on Jan. 6th Actions

Much like CNN, MSNBC has been the epicenter of some pretty colossal media fails over the last few years, with one of the most notable among them being Rachel Maddow’s epic “We’ve got Trump’s tax returns” flop from March 2017.

Here we are six years later, and not much has changed, except the “walls are closing in” stories are creeping back into the news cycles again, with the most recent one being one that “broke” Tuesday night from MSNBC anchor Ari Melber, where he posted what he felt like was shockingly revealing audio of Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) from Jan 2, 2021 “plotting to steal the election before Jan. 6.”


Naturally, the Usual Suspects jumped on it as a “gotcha,” as though this was definitive proof that Cruz planned all along to “install Donald Trump as dictator”:

Sadly for his haters, Cruz reminded Melber that he was on record as making the case Melber referenced in the audio clip multiple times – publicly:

Cruz even got a suprising assist from Mike DeBonis, who is an editor for Politico’s “Playbook”:

Here’s how that Joint Statement, which had absolutely nothing to do with “stealing” an election, read:

“America is a Republic whose leaders are chosen in democratic elections. Those elections, in turn, must comply with the Constitution and with federal and state law.
“When the voters fairly decide an election, pursuant to the rule of law, the losing candidate should acknowledge and respect the legitimacy of that election. And, if the voters choose to elect a new office-holder, our Nation should have a peaceful transfer of power.
“The election of 2020, like the election of 2016, was hard fought and, in many swing states, narrowly decided. The 2020 election, however, featured unprecedented allegations of voter fraud, violations and lax enforcement of election law, and other voting irregularities.
“Voter fraud has posed a persistent challenge in our elections, although its breadth and scope are disputed. By any measure, the allegations of fraud and irregularities in the 2020 election exceed any in our lifetimes.
“And those allegations are not believed just by one individual candidate. Instead, they are widespread. Reuters/Ipsos polling, tragically, shows that 39% of Americans believe ‘the election was rigged.’ That belief is held by Republicans (67%), Democrats (17%), and Independents (31%).
“Some Members of Congress disagree with that assessment, as do many members of the media.
“But, whether or not our elected officials or journalists believe it, that deep distrust of our democratic processes will not magically disappear. It should concern us all. And it poses an ongoing threat to the legitimacy of any subsequent administrations.
“Ideally, the courts would have heard evidence and resolved these claims of serious election fraud. Twice, the Supreme Court had the opportunity to do so; twice, the Court declined.
“On January 6, it is incumbent on Congress to vote on whether to certify the 2020 election results. That vote is the lone constitutional power remaining to consider and force resolution of the multiple allegations of serious voter fraud.
“At that quadrennial joint session, there is long precedent of Democratic Members of Congress raising objections to presidential election results, as they did in 1969, 2001, 2005, and 2017. And, in both 1969 and 2005, a Democratic Senator joined with a Democratic House Member in forcing votes in both houses on whether to accept the presidential electors being challenged.
“The most direct precedent on this question arose in 1877, following serious allegations of fraud and illegal conduct in the Hayes-Tilden presidential race. Specifically, the elections in three states-Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina-were alleged to have been conducted illegally.
“In 1877, Congress did not ignore those allegations, nor did the media simply dismiss those raising them as radicals trying to undermine democracy. Instead, Congress appointed an Electoral Commission-consisting of five Senators, five House Members, and five Supreme Court Justices-to consider and resolve the disputed returns.
“We should follow that precedent. To wit, Congress should immediately appoint an Electoral Commission, with full investigatory and fact-finding authority, to conduct an emergency 10-day audit of the election returns in the disputed states. Once completed, individual states would evaluate the Commission’s findings and could convene a special legislative session to certify a change in their vote, if needed.
“Accordingly, we intend to vote on January 6 to reject the electors from disputed states as not ‘regularly given’ and ‘lawfully certified’ (the statutory requisite), unless and until that emergency 10-day audit is completed.
“We are not naive. We fully expect most if not all Democrats, and perhaps more than a few Republicans, to vote otherwise. But support of election integrity should not be a partisan issue. A fair and credible audit-conducted expeditiously and completed well before January 20-would dramatically improve Americans’ faith in our electoral process and would significantly enhance the legitimacy of whoever becomes our next President. We owe that to the People.
“These are matters worthy of the Congress, and entrusted to us to defend. We do not take this action lightly. We are acting not to thwart the democratic process, but rather to protect it. And every one of us should act together to ensure that the election was lawfully conducted under the Constitution and to do everything we can to restore faith in our Democracy.”

Here’s Cruz making the same argument on the Senate floor:


Any day that the cast of characters at MSDNC end up with egg on their faces is a good day and today, obviously, has been a very good day.

Flashback: MSNBC Anchor Gets Mugged by Reality During Segment on J6 Committee Antics

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RNC Launches Website Fact-Checking Biden’s Lies in Real Time

Debt Standoff: House GOP Moves to Lock Down Package to Force Biden’s Hand on Spending Limit